ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the current global pandemic of which residual symptoms exhibited by post-acute, rehabilitating patients include fatigue, dyspnoea, and insomnia. Chinese medicine (CM) has been widely used in China to treat different stages of COVID-19. While there are a significant number of clinical studies suggesting its efficacy and safety in its use during acute stage, there are very few randomized controlled trials focusing on the rehabilitation stage. Liujunzhi Decoction and Shashen Maidong Decoction are frequently recommended by official clinical guidelines in China to treat COVID-19 patients in rehabilitation stage. This double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of the two formulae [named "COVID-19 Rehab Formula (CRF)"] in treating COVID-19 residual symptoms (long COVID). Methods: Eligible subjects will be randomly divided into treatment group and control group in 1:1 ratio. Treatment group will receive CRF along with certain pre-defined CM according to symptoms for 8 weeks, while control group will receive equivalent packs of placebo for 8 weeks. Data in terms of Fatigue Severity Score (FSS), self-reported COVID-19 long term symptom assessment, the modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnoea Scale, EuroQol Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire, pulmonary function test and adverse events will be collected and analyzed by SPSS 24. Blood test on liver and renal functions will also be conducted as safety measures. Conclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CRF in the treatment COVID-19 residual symptoms in a scientifically rigorous design. Clinical trial registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04924881].
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: With increasing number of clinical trials relating to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), it is crucial to identify and recruit long-term, healthy, and regular fecal donors. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to report the outcomes of screening and recruitment of fecal donors for FMT. METHODS: Potential donors were recruited via advertisement through internal mass emails at a university. They were required to undergo a pre-screening telephone interview, a detailed questionnaire, followed by blood and stool investigations. RESULTS: From January 2017 to December 2020, 119 potential donors were assessed with 75 failed pre-screening. Reasons for failure included: inability to come back for regular and long-term donation (n = 19), high body mass index (n = 17), underlying chronic illness or on long-term medications (n = 11), being healthcare professionals (n = 10), use of antibiotics within 3 months (n = 5) and others (n = 13). Forty-four donors completed questionnaires and 11 did not fulfill the clinical criteria. Of the remaining 33 potential donors who had stool and blood tests, 21 failed stool investigations (19 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase [ESBL] organisms, one Clostridioides difficile, one C. difficile plus Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus), one failed blood tests (high serum alkaline phosphatase level), one required long-term medication and nine withdrew consent and/or lost to follow-up. In total, only one out of 119 (0.8%) potential donors was successfully recruited as a regular donor. CONCLUSION: There was a high failure rate in donor screening for FMT. Main reasons for screening failure included high prevalence of positive ESBL organisms in stool and failed commitment to regular stool donation.